Earlier this week we wrote a post comparing certain cricketers to some of the footballers on show at the World Cup. For example Kevin Pietersen's ability to divide opinion as a love and hate figure whilst being vain and a bit of a mincer we judged as a deadringer for Cristiano Ronaldo.
So, to coincide with the start of the World Cup quarter finals today, we turn our attention to the teams. If cricket's nine test sides were at the World Cup, which footballing nation would they be?
Pakistan are France - Bit of an obvious one this one. The football world was amazed by the dysfunctional, disloyal and mutinous French, but thanks to Pakistan and the PCB, cricket is familiar with having a crazy team and an even crazier administrative board within its ranks. L'equipe de France is only an apprentice in controversy compared to the old hands of Pakistan.
India are England - Both full of richly talented performers but who continually fail to deliver on the big stage that is the World Cup to deflate the huge media expectation at home. 44 years of hurt for the England football team is nearly equalled by India's 27 year gap since they won the cricket World Cup in 1983. However, at least India are the number one ranked test side; the England football team have done nothing as good.
England are Spain - Until recently, both sides had failed to deliver on the big stage for a very long time. England had a false start with winning the 2005 Ashes, but since the introduction of Andy Flower as coach have regained the Ashes and now won the World T20. Spain finally broke their quarter final hoodoo in the 2008 European Championships and now both teams dream of the ultimate success of a football World Cup and an Ashes win in Australia. Both have a really good chance.
Australia are Germany - England's biggest foe in cricket and football respectively, both are now rebuilding after long periods of success. Whilst both are not quite the side they were in days of yore, both tend to raise their game for England and like nothing more than rubbing the nose of St George in the mud. It is a fool that would ever rule out the Australian cricket side and the German football team.
South Africa are Portugal- Consistently strong teams that never seem to win anything and have a tendency to choke. South Africa have stumbled with the victory line in sight in so many competitions, but the 1999 World Cup particularly sticks out with the two games against Australia and Herschelle Gibbs dropping the World Cup. Portugal too had the ultimate opportunity for a trophy when they played obdurate Greece at home in the European Championship Final of 2004, but contrived to lose 1-0 with Ronaldo finishing the game in tears (ha ha).
Sri Lanka are Holland - Continually punch above their weight, limited resources and a small population, and do so with a huge degree of style whilst even managing to win things. For Sri Lanka, it was the 1996 World Cup and strong subsequent performances plus colourful players such as Jayasuriya, Da Silva, Sangakkara, Vaas and Murali. Whilst for Holland, read the 1988 European Championship victory, two World Cup finals and some of the greatest footballers ever in Cruyff, Gullit and Van Basten.
West Indies are Italy - Fallen champions. Italy unbelievably finished bottom of a weak group containing Paraguay, New Zealand and Slovakia just four years after winning the World Cup. West Indies have been on a downward spiral ever since Australia won their elusive series in the Caribbean in 1995. Italy will rise again though, but will the demoralised West Indies?
New Zealand are Paraguay - Always seem to qualify for the second stage, but are then found wanting due to a lack of stardust and strength in depth. Dependable, tough to beat but ultimately boring. Finally, with South America having a history of dictators, Daniel Vettori would be right at home.
Bangladesh are Cameroon/Nigeria - Despite continuous stories saying Bangladesh are getting better they continue to lose and rank at the bottom of the pile. Whilst African football is reasonably strong and has a number of the best players in the world, the predictions of many (including Pele) that an African country would win the World Cup has failed to materialise and only Ghana made it past the group stage in South Africa. So it may be a bit of an unfair comparison to Cameroon and Nigeria, but for failing to even win a match in this year's World Cup, for now they are Bangladesh.
Australia -> Brazil (Most successful)
West Indies -> Uruguay (Past glory)
England -> Germany (Young multicultural sides)
India -> Spain (Flair, regional factions, little success)
Posted by: Mahek | Friday, July 02, 2010 at 07:53
In addition to Mahek,
South Africa -> England... lots of names, but never get across the line! Also, Greame Smith does look a bit like Frank Lampard, doesn't he?
Posted by: Shridhar Jaju | Friday, July 02, 2010 at 14:00
I can see the Brazil-Aussie comparison too Mahek and indeed wrote a post today about their lost aura (Brazil, Australia and the loss of sporting aura http://bit.ly/b730Hd). So, maybe it should be Germany or Brazil for Australia. I thought about Uruguay for the West Indies but their renaissance in this WC left me with a short term comparison with Italy. I still think India are more like England for the same reasons as your recent post ('golden' generation, press hysteria and post mortems when they fail)
As an Englishman I could never agree with a comparison with Germany, but I can see your thinking!
Posted by: The Reverse Sweep | Saturday, July 03, 2010 at 12:50
Nice one Shridhar - Graeme Smith does look a bit like a fatter Frank Lampard!
Posted by: The Reverse Sweep | Saturday, July 03, 2010 at 12:51
To be fair to Bangladesh, they are in the top 10 sides in the world. It is just, because of cricket's elitist structure, they only get to play the top-9. If you compared Portugal's record against the major footballing powers they wouldn't be much better.
For mind:
Australia-Germany
New Zealand-Netherlands
India-Italy
Sri Lanka-Spain
Bangladesh-Portugal
Pakistan-France
West Indies-Argentina
South Africa-Brazil
Zimbabwe-Uruguay
England-England
Posted by: Russ | Tuesday, July 06, 2010 at 05:03
West indies would be brazil, we play with more panache and style than anybody else. Viv richards would be pele and brian lara would be zico
Posted by: Ravi Ramkalewan | Tuesday, August 31, 2010 at 05:23
The old West Indian side of the 70s to early 90s, I agree Ravi, but unfortunately those days seem to have gone for West Indian cricket
Posted by: The Reverse Sweep | Friday, September 03, 2010 at 11:35
Your articles are purely enough for me.
buy fifa 13
Posted by: Account Deleted | Wednesday, August 01, 2012 at 07:58